What was the ruling of the court in the DLSU Inc. Vs Court of Appeals?

It is the CHED, not DECS, which has the power of supervision and review over disciplinary cases decided by institutions of higher learning. The creation of the CHED was purely academic like the formulation, recommendation, setting, and development of academic plans, programs and standards for institutions of higher learning. Private respondents were accorded due process of law. The private respondents were informed regarding their hearings and were also given the chance to defend themselves with their own evidences. In addition, the statements and evidences against them were also presented to them during the hearings so therefore they were not deprived of any due process with accordance to the law. The penalty of expulsion imposed by DLSU on private respondents is disproportionate to their misdeed. Although De La Salle University has the power to discipline its students, the penalty of expulsion imposed by school to the private respondents is unjust and too much for a penalty primarily because every student has the constitutional guarantee of the right to education and academic freedom. Therefore, the only sanction appropriate to the respondents is exclusion and not expulsion.

The post What was the ruling of the court in the DLSU Inc. Vs Court of Appeals? appeared first on interaksyonph.